Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 3:59:54 GMT -6
Enrique Arnaldo facing the symbol of justice. arnaldo Roberto R. Aramayo ROBERTO R. ARAMAYO NOVEMBER 11, 2021, 2:45 P.M. “ The jurist who has adopted as a symbol the scales of law, and along with it also the sword of justice, commonly uses the sword, not only to remove all influences foreign to law, but to place it on the scales when not wants one of the plates to expire ” (I. Kant, Towards Perpetual Peace ) Justice is usually symbolically represented with a blindfold and a scale. However, we tend to assume that those who must apply it are not so impartial. We have assumed that his ideological orientation will influence his opinions , despite wearing the toga. That's why we talk about conservative or progressive candidates. The naturalness with which we assume this is worrying. However, it is even more so that the political parties, after adopting this premise instead of doing everything possible to contravene it, use it to undermine the division of powers and place their supporters in bodies of the judiciary.
As Enrique Arnaldo himself has said, a candidate to be part of the constitutional court must not only have an impeccable record, but must also appear honest and upright. I have never understood the voting discipline of the parliamentary group and I criticized it in my article entitled There Australia Phone Number are no ethics for robots . The task of our political representatives is not to disqualify each other, even if they have not done anything else for a long time, but to debate, exchanging arguments and ideas to solve problems instead of generating them. Each representative should vote according to his conscience and not as if he were a robot applying certain algorithms programmed by his leader. Many years ago Ventura Pérez Mariño left his deputy record for not understanding this perverse mechanism , especially when he had been characterized by basing his dissenting private vote as a magistrate.
Pedro Sánchez himself also left Parliament because he did not want to vote for Mariano Rajoy's investiture. It was not bad for him to adopt that position of disagreement . It is not worth saying anything about Enrique Arnaldo. Nothing more eloquent than reviewing his career, so characterized by a totally fictitious or imposted integrity and impartiality. will not only remember the armistice of the Great War , but also a vote in which the parties that make up the government coalition have attempted to vote seamlessly for a bad agreement. They explain to us that in this way an essential renewal of fundamental collegiate bodies is unlocked and even that in this way it will be possible to achieve an upcoming progressive majority in them. In the best of cases, this calculation would be as instrumentalist as that used by his political adversaries, who have the advantage of not being embarrassed by corruption, after several regional presidents imprisoned or prosecuted for rather unexemplary practices.
As Enrique Arnaldo himself has said, a candidate to be part of the constitutional court must not only have an impeccable record, but must also appear honest and upright. I have never understood the voting discipline of the parliamentary group and I criticized it in my article entitled There Australia Phone Number are no ethics for robots . The task of our political representatives is not to disqualify each other, even if they have not done anything else for a long time, but to debate, exchanging arguments and ideas to solve problems instead of generating them. Each representative should vote according to his conscience and not as if he were a robot applying certain algorithms programmed by his leader. Many years ago Ventura Pérez Mariño left his deputy record for not understanding this perverse mechanism , especially when he had been characterized by basing his dissenting private vote as a magistrate.
Pedro Sánchez himself also left Parliament because he did not want to vote for Mariano Rajoy's investiture. It was not bad for him to adopt that position of disagreement . It is not worth saying anything about Enrique Arnaldo. Nothing more eloquent than reviewing his career, so characterized by a totally fictitious or imposted integrity and impartiality. will not only remember the armistice of the Great War , but also a vote in which the parties that make up the government coalition have attempted to vote seamlessly for a bad agreement. They explain to us that in this way an essential renewal of fundamental collegiate bodies is unlocked and even that in this way it will be possible to achieve an upcoming progressive majority in them. In the best of cases, this calculation would be as instrumentalist as that used by his political adversaries, who have the advantage of not being embarrassed by corruption, after several regional presidents imprisoned or prosecuted for rather unexemplary practices.